On 04/02/2014 04:33 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 07:05 PM, Christie Koehler wrote:
>> 1) Websites > wiki.mozilla.org
>> 2) Infrastructure & Operations > WebOps: IT-Managed Tools
> I've only followed the first. I would prefer technical issues be filed
> there. Is there a compelling reason to keep technical issues out of there?
Can you give an example of what you mean by 'technical issues'?
> If there is, does anyone have a good way for me to monitor the second
> queue and ignore everything non-wiki?
If we use the second for only things that someone on the WebOps team can
do (like code deployments), then would you need to follow the component?
If we're planning a specific action you could be notified by explicitly
cc'ing you or by linking to a tracking bug in wiki.mozilla.org.
I think the rationale for using both components depending on the
situation is to help demarcate when WebOps actually needs to do
something vs this working group or a wiki admin (which doesn't require
Does that make sense? Someone from WebOps should probably weigh in as
they're affected by this.
Education Lead, Community Building Team