On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Patrick McManus wrote:
> I think what you describe (as more aggressive) would be a fine gecko
I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1363284.
> Hopefully fetch would say something much more generic?
Could you explain why it's not desirable to describe this in more
detail? It sounds like you don't agree with my preconnect example and
giving developers a guaranteed contract to write code against, but you
didn't really address it.