Date:  09 Jun 2016 15:33:15 Hong Kong Time

Re: Improving Date.parse


On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, Morgan Reece wrote:
> After spending some time looking at the date parsers in SpiderMonkey, V8,
> and Chakra I think the most sensible way to fix this situation once and for
> all is to create a date parsing grammar and lobby to have it put into the
> spec. I've been fiddling around with a working implementation for the past
> few days and would appreciate any feedback or improvements.

Morgan, are you trying to create a grammar that strictly matches the EMCA-262 spec or one that matches the (union or intersection of) quirks and heuristics used in different browsers?