From:  John Lenz <concavelenz@gmail.com>
Date:  11 Oct 2013 22:04:13 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.mozilla.org/mozilla.dev.js-sourcemap
Subject:  

Re: Allow utilizing fragments of the minified file name for map file names

NNTP-Posting-Host:  63.245.216.66

Is there a reason to add a new annotation rather than simply leaving the
URL off the existing one?
On Jul 10, 2013 3:08 PM, "Fitzgerald, Nick"  wrote:

> On 7/9/13 9:25 AM, Michał Gołębiowski wrote:
>
>> Ping again? We keep getting hurt because of that in jQuery, e.g. this CDN
>> has a wrong location of the minified file:
>> http://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/**ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.3/jquery.**min.js
>> Could we have the `@hasImplicitSourceMapUrl` added to the spec, please?
>>
> I'm ok with adding `//# hasImplicitSourceMapURL` although (at the risk of
> bike shedding) I think `//# implicitSourceMap` is a better name.
>
> To find the source map for the script you just append ".map" to the
> script's URL?
>
> For inline scripts in a page do you still just append the ".map"? How
> would this work with http://example.com?
> http://example.com.map doesn't work, would we do http://example.com/.map?
> Disallow implicit source map linking for inline scripts? What about eval'd
> code?
>
> Can you (or someone else) write up a proposal that answers these questions
> and gives a solid algorithm for finding an implicit source map that we
> would be able to just drop into the spec?
>
> Nick
> ______________________________**_________________
> dev-js-sourcemap mailing list
> dev-js-sourcemap@lists.**mozilla.org 
> https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-js-sourcemap
>