http://www.islamicparty.com/commonsense/36movement.htm
Table of Contents:
Introduction
䥲ay�Propaganda
The One In Ten Myth
Catch Them Young
The Consequences of Unnatural Sex
Other Homosexual Propaganda Techniques
Bad Blood
Ethnic Minorities Resist Brainwashing
Islam & The Trojan Horse Of Gay 𣫮ights�
AIDS & Africa
Endnote - Hope For The Damned
Notes & References
Introduction
We live in an age of oppressed minorities. Turn on the TV, tune
into the radio, pick up a newspaper, and you are sure to see,
hear or read a heartrending plea from a highly paid spokesman or
spokeswoman of some minority or other expounding at length on
how they are oppressed by capitalism, racism, prejudice,
bigotry, and so on, and how they need special rights,
privileges, legal protection, and public money which you - the
taxpayer and ratepayer - should cough up gladly. Indeed, how can
you not be ashamed at the way these poor people have suffered in
the past, and how they continue to suffer now?
Blacks continue to claim that they are oppressed because of
slavery - yes, slavery. Women - who make up 51% of the adult
population - are also an oppressed minority, black women doubly
so. Moslems are no less adept at claiming victim status, and of
course, the world's whipping boy since time immemorial has been
and continues to be the Jew. Or so Jewish spokesmen never tire
of telling us.
None of these claims is entirely without merit. Blacks are among
the highest paid sportsmen in the world, including particularly
heavyweight boxing, which they dominate. Black men and women are
also among the world's highest paid entertainers. But you don't
have to look far to find especially young, lower class black men
who have had a raw deal - even in the land of the free. Women
not only own more wealth than men, they also outlive us, but the
rape statistics in our supposedly civilised society should make
all men hang their heads in shame. Moslems are among the
wealthiest people in Britain, but far from all of them, and as I
write these words there are Moslems suffering and dying in
Occupied Palestine, India and many other countries. And however
much all Moslems may abhor the poisonous ideology of political
Zionism, there are innocent Jews suffering in 𨧻srael�and many
other countries either because of or in spite of Jewish racial
supremacy.
Indeed, it is probably true that each and every one of us
belongs to some oppressed minority; wealthy and powerful middle
aged, middle class white men are more prone to stress and heart
attacks than most other groups. Be that as it may, it is a
fallacy that all minorities are oppressed. Convicted murderers
are a very tiny minority, but none of us should lose any sleep
over the fact that those rightly convicted of the ultimate crime
are deprived of their liberty for many years, in some cases
forever.
Another such minority, albeit one that is somewhat lower down
the hierarchy of infamy than murderers, are practising
homosexuals. In our ordered universe, Jews, Moslems, trades
unionists, sportsmen, and many others, are bound by blood,
religion, ideology or common interest. So too increasingly are
homosexuals, and like all these others, the Organised Homosexual
Movement has its spin doctors, to borrow a phrase from New
Labour. Though spin is a relatively new term, spin itself is as
old as the hills; it is better known as propaganda. Propaganda
is not necessarily a bad thing, else why proselytise the Faith?
But propaganda that is aimed at normalising perversion,
degradation, filth and squalor must be recognised for what it
is, and fought tooth and claw. Such is the propaganda of the
Organised Homosexual Movement.
䥲ay�Propaganda
In July 1960, a series in the girls' comic School Friend was
called The Gay Princess, while in October 1961, another girls'
comic, June, referred to its Star of the Week as 孄ay Helen
Shapiro� (1) Today, a gay princess and a gay singer would have
entirely different connotations. In his autobiography, published
some five years later, a senior Scottish police officer
recounted how in his younger days he had been engaged in the
suppression of homosexual practices in the public toilets of
Edinburgh.
William Merrilees might be described as an old-fashioned no-
nonsense 𡤧opper� Before the Second World War when he was head
of the Vice Squad, he was given the task of cleaning up the
city's lowlife, and he did so with alacrity. In a chapter The
Campaign Against Homosexuality, he enthused: 幞ow that we had
convictions to our credit, I felt free to wage wholesale war on
these perverts and their associates, and quite a number of
arrests were made from urinals throughout the city.�(2)
This admirable moral crusade was to result in the closure of
nine public urinals and other premises. Nowadays, any police
officer who campaigned against homosexuality would be accused of
homophobia, and one who referred openly to homosexuals as
perverts would be hauled up in front of a disciplinary board.
Even then at times rightly feared British police have been cowed
by the constant barrage of gay propaganda.
Gay, this happy sounding word, has been verbally kidnapped by
the homosexual lobby. The evidence that homosexuality is gay is
close to non-existent, but by dint of incessant repetition we
have reached the stage where even the staunchest opponents of
this perversion refer openly to homosexuals as gays.
Although one must always be careful about how one interprets
statistics, the evidence from statistics as from other sources
is impressive - or rather horrifying - that homosexuals are
emphatically not gay; that by and large they die younger, are
more prone to violence - both as victims and as perpetrators -
(3) and that they are vectors of the most abominable diseases
known to man.
Any honest, unbiased person who has studied the medical
literature relating to homosexuality will surely reach the same
conclusion. This is undoubtedly the reason there are so few
homosexual doctors.
In addition to proselytising homosexuality as gay, the Organised
Homosexual Movement has coined an epithet, homophobia, which
like racist or anti-Semite is the modern day equivalent of
branding somebody a witch. In 1997, an American psychiatrist
wrote that: 𨧻n 1970, homosexuality was an illness so dangerous
to the commonwealth that the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization
Service was charged with excluding homosexuals from entering the
country...Today, homosexuality is a normal life style;
disapproving of it is a mental illness called 'homophobia'...�
(4)
In a press release dated December 15, 1973, the American
Psychiatric Association became the first medical organisation
懀o officially remove the stigma of disease from persons with
same-sex preference� (5)
One might ask what new findings were made about homosexuality
between 1970 and 1973 to reverse the diagnosis that it is a
disease? The answer is of course none, but the homosexual lobby
(6) brought about this reversal by its persistent and for the
most part dishonest public campaigning and lobbying of
government and influential organisations. Homosexuality is
indeed a disease, but a disease of the spirit.
The One In Ten Myth
The statistic that homosexual activists are most fond of
spouting is the mythical one in ten. Writing in the unofficial
Labour Party magazine Briefing, (7) in 1993, the well-known and
vocal homosexual activist Peter Tatchell reports that �0 per
cent of the population is exclusively or predominantly
queer...� (his word); that �5 per cent are bisexual for all or
part of their lives� while �5-35 per cent have at least one
homosexual experience leading to orgasm during their
lifetime...�(8)
These figures are derived from the so-called researches of Dr
Alfred Kinsey (1894-1956), an American sexologist who published
two widely publicised reports (9) on human sexuality in the late
40s/early 50s. It is Kinsey's report on the human male that is
the most widely cited. (10)
Kinsey's remarkable findings extend way beyond mere
homosexuality, and anyone who has read his work with the
slightest critical faculty will soon conclude they would
laughable if they were not so sick. For example, Kinsey and his
team report that of boys raised on farms, 弌bout 17 per cent
experience orgasm as the product of animal contacts...after the
onset of adolescence�and that up to 28% of college level rural
males have some animal experience to the point of orgasm. Well
over half of these have some kind of sexual contact with
animals. (11)
One can only imagine what Kinsey understood by the word orgasm,
but leaving that aside it is clear that he is confusing the true
meanings of words and emotions. As the Conservative author
Stephen Green writes poetically of agony aunt Claire Rayner, she
uses the word love too loosely for us to know whether she means
friendship, affection, commitment, or ten minutes in a public
convenience. (12)
Two academics, Reisman (13) and Eichel, who subjected Kinsey's
researches to a close scrutiny, have thoroughly discredited his
findings. Even though 孏he Kinsey Reports have become the
starting point for subsequent sex research�and 孏he textbooks
quote Kinsey's findings as if they were undisputed truth� (14)
Kinsey's research has never been replicated. (15)
Leaving aside academic studies, mere observation is enough to
indicate that far less than one in ten of the population is
homosexual, actively so or otherwise. The grain of truth in
Peter Tatchell's assertion that �5-35 per cent have at least
one homosexual experience leading to orgasm during their
lifetime...�may be that most of us have some sort of homosexual
experience at some time in our lives, but that depends of course
on how you define the term homosexual experience. If you are
propositioned by a homosexual, or if an openly homosexual man
smiles at you lustfully in the street, then you too have had a
homosexual experience.
The actual percentage of the population that is homosexual -
overtly or otherwise - is extremely difficult to determine. This
is made even more difficult by the fact that homosexuals are
concentrated in certain locations, (16) in certain professions,
(17) and that they make a lot of noise.
The purpose of the constant repetition of the mythical one in
ten is to attempt further to 忛ormalise�homosexuality. This
argument is in any case spurious, as Sahib Bleher pointed out in
a reply to a query on the Party website: 懀he assumption [here
is] that the mere existence of a condition justifies its
validity, and that decisions are to be taken on the basis of how
much support there is rather than on the question whether
something is morally justified.�
Using the same fallacious logic, paedophilia, theft, even murder
can be justified. As stated above, not all minorities are
oppressed, and some deserve to be dealt with severely.
It is important to recognise that even many people who might
otherwise be considered 𩂈ight wing�have fallen for much
homosexual propaganda. As well as referring to homosexuals as
gay, they often take the homosexual lobby's self-serving
statistics at face value. (18)
Catch Them Young
There is an old maxim - attributed to the Jesuits - that if you
school a child for the first six or seven years of its life, it
doesn't matter who has it for the rest. The age of consent in
Britain is now sixteen. Up until recently the age of consent for
homosexual acts was eighteen. The Labour Government, heavily
influenced by both the homosexuals in its own upper echelons
(19) and the homosexual lobby in general, was intent on lowering
the age of consent to sixteen on the grounds that not to do so
would be to perpetuate homophobia. It did so in spite of a
revolt in the Lords led by Baroness Young.
In February 1994 when a vote to lower the age of consent for
sodomy to sixteen was lost, hundreds of militant homosexuals
stormed Parliament and abused MPs. This was in spite of the
House voting to lower the age of consent to eighteen, which
under the circumstances was certainly a concession to
perversion. Peter Tatchell was quoted in the Times thus: 孏hey
have no respect for us, so we will have no respect for
Parliament.�He also threatened a major campaign of civil
disobedience. (20) About ten arrests were reported. (21)
In November 1998, when the government tried again to lower the
age of consent for homosexual acts, the Lords prevailed. One
magazine reported that Tatchell wanted to push for it to be
lowered to fourteen. Other members of his group, OutRage, voted
to keep it at sixteen (for then) for fear of alienating the
public (and exposing their true agenda). (22)
Two years later, a letter published in the Daily Telegraph and
signed by nine doctors headed by Lady McEwen, C.A.B. Johnston
and Professor Gordon Stewart warned the government of the
Physical dangers of unnatural sex. Two of the signatories had
Islamic names, (23) and doubtless all Moslem doctors (along with
the great majority of all other religions and none) shared the
same sentiments. The signatories argued that by lowering the age
of consent for homosexual acts the government would be failing
in its duty to protect young boys. Unfortunately, the government
and the homosexual lobby prevailed, and the age of consent for
homosexual acts was indeed lowered.
Now, Tatchell in particular has come out of the closet. (24)
This year he has published a paper calling for the age of
consent to be lowered to fourteen for all sexual acts. (25) Two
examples of his sophistry from this paper will suffice:
孏wo 14 year olds who have a mutually agreed relationship risk
maximum penalties ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment...�
By the same token, the maximum penalty for shoplifting is seven
years imprisonment. Who in modern Britain has ever been
sentenced to seven years for simple theft? (26)
One reason Tatchell advocates lowering the age of consent is to
cure the sexual illiteracy of the young. Sex advice by teachers
is said to be vague, euphemistic and even useless. 孏hey never
dare promote the obvious: oral sex and mutual masturbation as
safer alternatives to intercourse� This is a bit like promoting
grievous bodily harm as a safer alternative to murder, but the
duplicity of the Organised Homosexual Movement knows no bounds.
The doctors who signed the letter to the Daily Telegraph pointed
out that teenagers often have (what they believe to be)
homosexual desires of a transient nature.
Young boys in particular may be attracted to other boys and
young men for reasons that have little or nothing to do with
sex. Not all of us are equally endowed with good looks, fine
physique, intelligence, personality, wealth, or even something
as simple as dress sense. This may lead to envy, which can be
easily confused with desire. With proper guidance or even with
none, the vast majority of teenagers will come through this
phase unscathed. (27) With improper guidance they may become
convinced that they are really gay and should come out as such.
Because homosexuals can't breed they must recruit in order to
perpetuate their perversion, and the younger their victims are
caught the better. Now that the age of consent for homosexual
acts has been lowered to sixteen, Tatchell and his friends want
it lowered to fourteen. If they get that they will demand it be
lowered to twelve, then ten. The end result is that predatory
homosexual paedophiles will have carte blanche to snatch young
boys off the streets and do with them what they will with total
impunity. This may sound hysterical, but there is a paedophile
movement in this country and worldwide which would like to see
exactly that. And it is an acknowledged fact that in Britain at
least the paedophile movement has its roots firmly in the gay
movement. (28)
During his campaign against homosexuality in pre-World War Two
Edinburgh, William Merrilees was shocked at the number of young
boys who had been ensnared by these perverts. In his
aforementioned memoirs, he wrote: 𨧻 was astonished at the
number of boys between the ages of fourteen and sixteen engaged
in this unpleasant business, some of them were effeminates, but
most of them were really male prostitutes.�(29) It should be
borne in mind that at this time, and for three decades after,
homosexuality was a criminal offence, yet this was apparently no
serious deterrent to those who would wilfully corrupt the young.
It is important for everyone to realise that there is no such
thing as gay youth; there are no homosexual teenagers. Even for
those who succumb to their inner demons and experiment with or
engage in homosexual practices there is hope. The young who
stray from the straight and narrow can be reformed, the same way
souls can be saved.
The Consequences of Unnatural Sex
The word that springs to mind most readily in connection with
the homosexual lifestyle is AIDS, but there is a plethora of
other exotic and terrible diseases associated with it. While it
is true that homosexuals do not have a monopoly on sexual
diseases, the incidence of almost all diseases amongst them is
horrifying. According to a 1983 study, in 1977 in New York City,
55% of primary, secondary and early latent syphilis cases were
in homosexual males. (30) 孏he homosexual male is said to be at
ten times greater risk of contracting syphilis than the
heterosexual male.�(31) Homosexual men were said to be
responsible for about half all reported cases of infectious
syphilis in the United States. (32)
Contact with faecal matter - including ingesting it - greatly
enhances all manner of other diseases besides those of a purely
sexual nature, including the most severe forms of hepatitis.
Physical damage is not only a real possibility but an inevitable
consequence of anal intercourse, which may include inserting
fingers, the entire hand and other objects into the orifice. (33)
No man or woman of ordinary intelligence who has a gramme of
common sense or human decency could conclude other than that
homosexuality is a curse, a blight and a bane on mankind, and
that as far as possible this perversion should be eradicated, in
particular that the young should be kept out of the clutches of
its practitioners and advocates.
Other Homosexual Propaganda Techniques
We have already mentioned the mythical disease of homophobia.
This smear word was coined as recently as 1967. (34) No one
should ever be intimidated by epithets, although many people
are, including powerful politicians. Eichel defines homophobia
as a smear term used to intimidate those who oppose the agendas
of homosexual activists. (35) These anti-homo activists have
fought back with an epithet of their own: heterophobia, which
Eichel says is 弌 term coined here to refer to those who have an
irrational fear of, and hostility toward, heterosexuality� (36)
Another academic, Masters, makes the point that: 孏he cruelest
form of injustice employed by the gay lobby is to accuse
sensitive, decent people of bigotry, hatred, and 'homophobia'
for simply following their own moral consciences and seeing
abnormal as abnormal� (37)
This sentiment is echoed by an American journalist who wrote:
孏hat word - homophobia - has always seemed a misnomer. Many
people don't fear the gay culture; they simply and
unapologetically hate it. The idea of same-sex sex gives them
the creeps.�(38) This is undoubtedly true, though the at times
open intimidation of this lobby has coerced most of its
opponents into silence, Islam being an honourable exception.
Another technique often used against homophobes is the innuendo
that they themselves are repressed homosexuals who are driven by
fear of being 㺸uted�or of some other, more personal fear. This
should be seen for exactly what it is, innuendo. One might just
as well accuse proselytising Moslems of being repressed
atheists. It is probably true that some homosexuals do cloak
themselves in lies, but this is simply plain old hypocrisy, and
should be seen as such.
Empathising with minorities in order to win reciprocal support
for their perversion is another tactic, and one that has met
with some success. In 1995, the Jewish Chronicle reported that
the World Congress of Gay and Lesbian Jewish Organisations had
arranged a two day conference in which it was resolved that 懀he
homosexual community should become involved in Holocaust
education� Present at this conference was no less a luminary
than the historian (and Zionist apologist) David Cesarani. The
International Association of Lesbian and Gay Children of
Holocaust Survivors was said to have 65 members. (39) Devout
Jews who died under the Nazi r嶲ime must be turning in their
graves.
�
]
|
|