From:  Bob Park <skeptix@lists.opn.org>
Date:  29 Mar 2011 11:33:48 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.alt119.net/sci.misc
Subject:  

[BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New 25 March 2011

NNTP-Posting-Host:  chebucto.ns.ca

WHAT	
1. IGNORANCE: HOUSE COMMITTEE VOTES TO OVERTURN NATURAL LAW.
The price of gasoline at the pump is at the highest level ever for this 
time of year.  Thatway to reduce consumption, thereby improving the
environment and delaying 
the dreaded Hubbert peak.  There are, however, two ways to raise the price 
to the consumer: increase the profit margin of the oil industry, or levy a 
large consumption tax.  The revenue from a heavy consumption tax would
help 
to pay the crushing costs of the Bush economy. You will not be surprised, 
however, to learn that the Republican Congress overwhelmingly prefers the 
first method, which will embodied in the Energy Tax Prevention Act of
2011, 
in preparation.  But first they had to amend the Clean Air Act to
eliminate 
the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency over greenhouse 
gases.  According to an editorial in last week's Nature, the Republican 
disdain for climate science was evident in the "anger and distrust
directed 
at scientists and scientific societies."  The widespread melting of snow 
and ice, and rising global average sea level, is unequivocal evidence of 
global warming, http://bobpark.physics.umd.edu/WN11/wn020411.html.  

2. CELL PHONES: ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST MOCKS ALBERT EINSTEIN.
It's not exactly a work of art, but I recently came across an image taken 
from the famous photo of Albert Einstein sticking his tongue out at the 
cameraman.  A different gesture would be used today. The caption 
was, "CAN'T CALL IT A SMART PHONE, IF IT KILLS BRAIN CELLS."  I
wasnamused.  It was put out by the Environmental Health Trust, a nonprofit 
educational foundation founded by Devra Davis.  She is the author 
of "Disconnect," a recklessly irresponsible book that falsely claims that 
radiation from cell phones causes serious health problems, including 
cancer.  It is particularly offensive that Einstein's image was used for 
such a purpose.  It was Einstein who pointed out in 1905 that microwave 
radiation is not ionizing, for which he was awarded the 1921 Nobel Prize
in 
Physics. I pointed this out 10 years ago in an editorial I wrote at the 
request of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, "Cellular 
Telephones and Cancer: How Should Science Respond?" It is too late to 
apologize to Dr. Einstein, but I expect a full apology from Dr. Davis.  

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND.
Opinions are the author's and not necessarily shared by the
University of Maryland, but they should be.
---
Archives of What's New can be found at http://www.bobpark.org