From:  "They Voted To Molest Children" <gay-perverts@hillaryclinton.com>
Date:  18 Apr 2014 14:16:12 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.alt119.net/cruzio.general
Subject:  

The American Psychological Association (APA)

NNTP-Posting-Host:  null

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, also known as the DSM, is 
the official list of mental disorders that all mental health 
professionals refer to when diagnosing patients.

The first version, released in 1952, listed homosexuality as a 
sociopathic personality disturbance. In 1968, the second version 
(DSM II) reclassified homosexuality as a sexual deviancy. Soon 
afterward, gay protestors began picketing at the APA𠏋 annual 
conventions, demanding that homosexuality be removed from the 
list completely. In 1973, after intensive debate and numerous 
disturbances by gay activists, the APA decided to remove 
homosexuality from its next manual (DSM III).

What followed was a swarm of outrage from psychiatrists within 
the APA who disagreed with the decision and demanded that the 
issue be reconsidered. In 1974, a referendum was called and 
approximately 40 percent of the APA𠏋 membership voted to put 
homosexuality back into the DSM. Since a majority was not 
achieved to reverse the decision, homosexuality remains omitted 
from the APA𠏋 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

To the LGBT community, this omission from the DSM was a logical 
move. They felt that, absent from any nonbiased social-science 
research to prove that homosexuality is inherently pathological, 
the only thing that had been keeping homosexuality in the DSM 
was societal prejudice. However, many in the scientific 
community have criticized the APA𠏋 decision to remove 
homosexuality from the DSM, claiming its motives were more 
political than scientific.

Dr. Ronald Bayer, author of the book Homosexuality and American 
Psychiatry, writes:

The entire process, from the first confrontation organized by 
gay demonstrators to the referendum demanded by the orthodox 
psychiatrists, seemed to violate the most basic expectations 
about how questions of science should be resolved.

Instead of being engaged in sober discussion of data, 
psychiatrists were swept up in a political controversy. The 
result was not a conclusion based on an approximation of the 
scientific truth as dictated by reason, but was instead an 
action demanded by the ideological temper of the times.

Along these same lines, a recent radio documentary on the 
subject of homosexuality revealed that the president-elect of 
the APA in 1973, Dr. John P. Speigel, was a 𡤧loseted homosexual 
with a very particular agenda.�

���