From:  "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Date:  15 Oct 2024 06:17:07 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.alt119.net/comp.lang.c
Subject:  

Re: ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect

NNTP-Posting-Host:  null

On 10/13/2024 7:57 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/13/2024 11:34 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> On 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson  wrote:
>>> On 10/12/2024 11:28 AM, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>>> On 12.10.2024 11:32, Jan van den Broek wrote:
>>>>> 2024-10-12, Chris M. Thomasson  
>>>>> schrieb:
>>>>>> On 10/11/2024 7:50 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [Schnipp]
>>>>>
>>>>> As I see it, the main Halting Problem is Olcott not halting.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! - A very nice one. Thanks for that. :-)
>>>
>>> I second that. :^)
>>
>> You're likely thousand-seconding that. The Olcott not halting joke
>> is many years old now, and will likely come up again.
>>
>>
> 
> My cancer has gotten worse.
> 
> *ChatGPT explains why rebuttals of my work are incorrect*
> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
> 
> I had to dumb this down from the original halting problem
> input so that reviewers can verify that HHH is correct
> without hardly paying any attention at all:
> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> When HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer
> then each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
[...]

Isn't that similar to:

void foobar()
{
     foobar();
}

?