On 03/09/2024 17:23, Thiago Adams wrote:
> but...maybe, is better to be a little redundant here?
> I think I prefer to leave "obj->member1->member2 && " even if I know
> it should not be null.
>
> if (obj->member1 &&
> obj->member1->member2 &&
> obj->member1->member2->member3)
> {
>
> }
I think I'd prefer to _omit_ the check that obj->member1->member2 isn't
null.
If the code is running correctly that check will never trigger, and is
redundant, and will slow things slightly.
But if the code is not running correctly it will conceal the bug by
preventing the crash.
But circumstances may vary. You probably don't want to crash an
autopilot if at all possible!
Andy
|
|