From:  "cindys" <cstein1@rochester.rr.com>
Date:  20 Apr 2004 00:24:04 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.alt119.net/ba.general
Subject:  

Re: Fatal Flaw In The 911 Coverup?

NNTP-Posting-Host:  66.66.10.49

"Bill Ding"  wrote in message
news:13s780h2m29ii6dkubg08vr0t3j6gu48su@4ax.com...
> Once upon a time, Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:12:00 GMT, according to
> alt.conspiracy - the Internet Entity known to the world as "cindys"
>  flexed its fingers and caressed its
> keyboard, resulting in sombunall of the following alphanums, which
> have been pruned to remove extraneous material:
>
> >> >>Here it [the original post] is in its entirety:
> >>
> >>
> >> > ----------------------
> >> > The hijackers would have been stopped
> >> > COLD if the pilots were armed with
> >> > handguns.
>
> And cindys said:
>
> >... No one on soc.culture.jewish added any additional groups to the
> >crosspost. (Why would we bother? To us, this post was total trash.
> > ...
>
> The OP said
>    "The hijackers would have been stopped
>     COLD if the pilots were armed with
>     handguns."
>
> I'm not understanding why you characterize this as "total trash".
------------
Because the OP characterized the situation as some sort of a "coverup."
Best regards,
---Cindy S.
>
> At worst, a gunfight on board the aircraft might've killed some of the
> passengers and crew and the hijackers might still have been permitted
> to complete their attack. At best, the hijackers would have been
> "stopped cold" with no loss of life except perhaps theirs. How is this
> "total trash" compared with the loss of lives and property that was
> the actual result?
>
>
>