On 10/2/24 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2024 at 8:28:15 AM PDT, "moviePig" wrote:
>
>> On 10/1/2024 6:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Oct 1, 2024 at 2:35:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/1/2024 5:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 1, 2024 at 1:40:36 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/1/2024 3:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2024 at 1:30:43 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous"
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leftist author Fran Lebowitz said late last week that President
>>>>>>>> Joe Biden
>>>>>>>> should dissolve the U.S. Supreme Court because she does not like
>>>>>>>> the fact
>>>>>>>> that the majority of justices are constitutional originalists.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I must have missed that day in Constitutional Law class where they
>>>>>>> taught us
>>>>>>> where to find the Constitution's grant of power to the president that
>>>>>>> allows
>>>>>>> him to just wake up one day and wave his hand like a Hogwarts wizard and
>>>>>>> fire
>>>>>>> the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've just now reviewed Article II and I still don't see anything
>>>>>>> resembling
>>>>>>> "The president shall have the power to dissolve the Supreme Court
>>>>>>> whenever
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> pisses him off." Maybe it's written in that invisible ink that the
>>>>>>> NATIONAL
>>>>>>> TREASURE movies teach us the Founders were so fond of.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seriously, though, I'd understand if some green-haired, nose-ringed
>>>>>>> teenager
>>>>>>> said this, because they're just a product of our public schools,
>>>>>>> but this
>>>>>>> Lebowitz idiot is supposed to be a serious scholar, and *this* is
>>>>>>> how she
>>>>>>> thinks our government runs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Serious scholar"? She's a cranky, 73-year old humorist who's as pissed
>>>>>> about the Supreme Court as the rest of us should be.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why should I be pissed about the Court?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because Thomas takes gifts? So do all the other justices, including the
>>>>> leftist ones. I'd be in favor of banning that, but that doesn't answer
>>>>> why I
>>>>> should be pissed about *this* Court versus previous ones.
>>>>
>>>> You should be pissed about Thomas because he's a boob.
>>>
>>> Sotomayor is a boob, too.
>>>
>>> Next?
>>>
>>>> You should be pissed about the Court because it's happy to sell out personal
>>>> freedom.
>>>
>>> As in?
>>>
>>> (Under this Court, I've regained freedoms that were taken from my by
>>> Democrats.)
>>
>> Congrats on your restored personal freedoms. I admit I'm more concerned
>> here with *others'* freedoms, e.g., your girlfriend's, my daughter's...
>
> My girlfriend supports the Court's repeal of Roe. Not for the same reason I
> do-- i.e., that the Constitution does not grant the federal government power
> over health care, so it's properly a matter of state and local jurisdiction
> per the 10th Amendment-- but she supports it for her own reasons.
>
> Nevertheless, I don't see why one person's freedom would be more important
> than someone else's.
You should get pregnant and find out you stupid fuck.
|
|