From:  trotsky <gmsingh@email.com>
Date:  04 Oct 2024 17:00:42 Hong Kong Time
Newsgroup:  news.alt119.net/alt.tv.hbo
Subject:  

Re: Leftist Fran Lebowitz: "Biden Should Dissolve The Supreme Court"

NNTP-Posting-Host:  null

On 10/2/24 1:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2024 at 8:28:15 AM PDT, "moviePig"  wrote:
> 
>> On 10/1/2024 6:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   On Oct 1, 2024 at 2:35:19 PM PDT, "moviePig"  wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   On 10/1/2024 5:04 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>     On Oct 1, 2024 at 1:40:36 PM PDT, "moviePig"  wrote:
>>>>>     
>>>>>>     On 10/1/2024 3:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>       On Oct 1, 2024 at 1:30:43 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>>       Leftist author Fran Lebowitz said late last week that President
>>>>>>>> Joe Biden
>>>>>>>>       should dissolve the U.S. Supreme Court because she does not like
>>>>>>>> the fact
>>>>>>>>       that the majority of justices are constitutional originalists.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       I must have missed that day in Constitutional Law class where they
>>>>>>>   taught us
>>>>>>>       where to find the Constitution's grant of power to the president that
>>>>>>>   allows
>>>>>>>       him to just wake up one day and wave his hand like a Hogwarts wizard and
>>>>>>>     fire
>>>>>>>       the Supreme Court.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       I've just now reviewed Article II and I still don't see anything
>>>>>>>   resembling
>>>>>>>       "The president shall have the power to dissolve the Supreme Court
>>>>>>> whenever
>>>>>>>     it
>>>>>>>       pisses him off." Maybe it's written in that invisible ink that the
>>>>>>>   NATIONAL
>>>>>>>       TREASURE movies teach us the Founders were so fond of.
>>>>>>>       
>>>>>>>       Seriously, though, I'd understand if some green-haired, nose-ringed
>>>>>>>   teenager
>>>>>>>       said this, because they're just a product of our public schools,
>>>>>>> but this
>>>>>>>       Lebowitz idiot is supposed to be a serious scholar, and *this* is
>>>>>>> how she
>>>>>>>       thinks our government runs?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     "Serious scholar"?  She's a cranky, 73-year old humorist who's as pissed
>>>>>>     about the Supreme Court as the rest of us should be.
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Why should I be pissed about the Court?
>>>>>     
>>>>>     Because Thomas takes gifts? So do all the other justices, including the
>>>>>     leftist ones. I'd be in favor of banning that, but that doesn't answer
>>>>> why I
>>>>>     should be pissed about *this* Court versus previous ones.
>>>>
>>>>   You should be pissed about Thomas because he's a boob.
>>>   
>>>   Sotomayor is a boob, too.
>>>   
>>>   Next?
>>>   
>>>>   You should be pissed about the Court because it's happy to sell out personal
>>>>   freedom.
>>>   
>>>   As in?
>>>   
>>>   (Under this Court, I've regained freedoms that were taken from my by
>>>   Democrats.)
>>
>> Congrats on your restored personal freedoms. I admit I'm more concerned
>> here with *others'* freedoms, e.g., your girlfriend's, my daughter's...
> 
> My girlfriend supports the Court's repeal of Roe. Not for the same reason I
> do-- i.e., that the Constitution does not grant the federal government power
> over health care, so it's properly a matter of state and local jurisdiction
> per the 10th Amendment-- but she supports it for her own reasons.
> 
> Nevertheless, I don't see why one person's freedom would be more important
> than someone else's.


You should get pregnant and find out you stupid fuck.